When MSNBC called Windows Media Center PCs a miss earlier this week I wrote my reply but I thought I would save the post for my first post on TechRadar.com's Digital Home Blog.
My thoughts were this: Windows Media Center is a service and not a product. The Media Center software should be server based powering Extenders (hardware and software) and not a desktop PC connected to a TV as the MSNBC article describes Windows Media Center. Here is a quote from my post:
A PC connected directly to a TV will always be a niche product but I also think that Windows Media Center has a big part to in the digital home by being a service and not a product. I see it as a Digital Media Server, where you have a TV card installed (either CableCARD, DVB-T, Sky etc) and then Extenders around the home, which could be devices like the Xbox 360 and the new generation of Extenders or smaller devices like ROKU Sound Bridge.
It could also perform the role of home automation server, security system and many other services. Obviously there is huge crossover of functionality with Windows Home Server and an ideal future product could combine the best of both products.
So while I see the product described in the MSNBC article as a miss Windows Media Center should have a great future powering the home, read my post and let me know what you think.
EDIT I want to say the title was Techradar.com's editors idea, my title was Media Center is a service not a product
Posted
Jun 27 2008, 11:22 AM
by
Ian Dixon